Pages

Saturday, July 17, 2010

Bishop Richard Williamson - 'Official' 9/11 story is a fraud - Twin Towers brought down with explosives



Transcript:

BISHOP WILLIAMSON: "Ruling us today it's not a party as brutal, as openly brutal as the Stalinists of Russia was. It's not yet a police state imposing upon us to say that two and two are five. But the police state, of course, every single one of you know, is certainly closing in, both here and in the United States for sure and certain. The police state took a great leap forward with 9-11. That's for certain.

And I hope that none of you believe that 9-11 is what it was presented to be. It was, of course, the two towers came down. But it was absolutely, for certain, not two airplanes which brought down those two towers. They were professionally demolished by a series of demolition charges from the top to the bottom of the towers. If you doubt that, look up on the internet "911Mysteries.com."

I mention this...you may find I do mention this in sermon. Why do I keep mentioning this in sermons? Because truth is at stake. Because if the towers fell down by two airplanes, then the Party is virtually in control. The party governs the people's minds. The party can push over all kinds of propaganda and lies, in it's media. And if the people swallow the lies, they will be enslaved.

Our Lord said the truth will make you free. The corollary it that lies will enslave you. At the moment, the whole world is being told lies....by the media, by the government, by the politicians, by the universities, by the teachers -- and the worst of all, by the highest authorities in the Church.

We are being enslaved by lies. And the most outstanding global lie of recent times to enslave the minds of all of us -- or to deceive the minds, and thereby enslave us by making us all believe that the police state is a good thing, and a necessary thing, which is why the police state has advanced by leaps and bounds, as it has -- is 9/11. And that's a classic example of an enslaving lie. Two and two are five. Those towers were brought down by two airplanes, and it was an airplane which struck the Pentagon. That's totally impossible....that an airplane struck the Pentagon. A commercial airplane has a very soft nose. You don't have a nose of titanium or steel. That's not what an airplane could fly with. If you tried taking off with that, it would nose-dive immediately after it lifted off the airport, if it had such a heavy nose. The nose of a commercial aircraft is very soft. It's just a little aluminum covering...the radar of the plane is usually under the nose. The nose is very soft.

Whatever hit the Pentagon went through six, punched it's way through six of the ten 18" stone walls between outside the Pentagon and its inner courtyard. There are five rings of buildings, each of them with an outer and inner wall, and whatever hit the Pentagon went through six of those ten walls before it came to a stop. The photographic evidence was clear as it could be. The newspapers, of course, did not publish those photographs, but they do exist.

Then, it can only have been a guided missile which struck the Pentagon, and only guided missiles have a tough nose, titanium and steel, with an explosive charge, of two charges -- one charge to penetrate the wall...and then the second charge to explode inside. And that's exactly what the photographs show, with a fire running up and down inside the outer wall of the Pentagon.

So, we were all of us told, and I hope none of us still believe, that it was the work of three commercial airliners piloted by 19 Mohammedans, who as you may well know, seven of, at least, are notably alive and walking around. Lies. Lies. Lies.

And that's where it's at. Lies or truth. And you will have today some decent non-Catholics, like George Orwell, decent and intelligent men. Some decent men who realize that what's at stake here -- even before, in a certain sense...in a certain sense even before religion is brought up, even before God is in question -- that is truth. Does there exist truth? Is there truth?"