Pages

Thursday, December 25, 2008

No "extermination camps" on German soil (or elsewhere in German-occupied territory) - Typhus epidemics the cause of mass deaths and emaciated bodies

source: http://guardian.150m.com/holocaust/why-believe.htm by way of seekingtruthnews

So, why do people believe in the holocaust?

Most people have been shown the film footage taken by American/British propaganda teams who accompanied troops as they liberated the Bergen, Belsen, Buchenwald, and Dachau, concentration camps.

The footage, especially from the Belsen camp, features large numbers of emaciated prisoners and corpses.

At this point, nearly everyone is deliberately (mis)led to the (false) conclusion that Jews were exterminated by gas chambers.

That this conclusion is false, is clear, if you are aware of the universally agreed fact, that there were no extermination camps in Germany. Even the extremist, Simon Wiesenthal, admitted this (in a letter to the respected British periodical Books and Bookmen, April 1975, p5, where he says "there were no extermination camps on German soil..."). No historian, Jew or otherwise, any longer claims that there were extermination camps in Germany (the Jew historians still claim that there were extermination camps, but now they claim that they were all located in Poland).

In particular, this means that there was no genocide, and no gas-chambers, at the camps Bergen, Belsen, Buchenwald or Dachau (as these camps were in Germany).

So, the above mentioned film footage from these German camps cannot be evidence for genocide, because, according to ALL the historians, there were no extermination camps in Germany

Clearly then, this US film footage DOES NOT, and NEVER DID, prove genocide of Jews.

So, the emaciated prisoners and corpses shown in the US film footage, had to have some other cause, or causes.

In fact, the other causes have long been known, but hidden by the Jews. Generally, the Germans managed to adequately feed the prisoners of the concentration camps, even with the transport system under sustained attack. Many photos are available which show thousands of reasonably well-fed prisoners. For example, this photo from Dachau (taken on liberation):
















Or, this photo from Buchenwald (taken on liberation).


















Or, this photo from Birkenau (Auschwitz) taken on liberation.














What actually happened, was that procedures aimed at holding various diseases in check, broke down under the pressures of war. The main killer, was Typhus. Typhus is spread by lice. Zyklon-B was an insecticide used to kill the lice that spread Typhus. The Typhus epidemics that raged through the camps (in both the first and second world wars) killed many thousands. If you suffer from Typhus, your body wastes away and you look as if you are starving to death. Typhus, is the reason for most of the severely emaciated prisoners and corpses.

Typhus, explains the mixture of severely emaciated prisoners and healthy prisoners. Those who caught the disease, became severely emaciated, and often died, those who didn't, remained reasonably healthy prisoners.












British guard post at entrance to Belsen camp.



A political prisoner at Belsen, stated:

"Towards the end of February 1945 my own situation changed completely.

By that time typhus had become a serious danger for the whole camp. It was the species of typhus which is transmitted by lice. At one time all the transports which arrived at Belsen had had to pass through a "human laundry" and this disinfection seems to have been effective enough to keep the camp free from lice until the autumn of 1944.

At the end of October a big transport had, for the first time, been admitted to the camp without being disinfected, because there had been some damage to the machinery of the shower-baths. Unfortunately the people of this transport were louse carriers, and from that day the lice gradually spread over the whole camp. [...] Typhus broke out in Camp I about the end of January. At first there were only a few cases, but a month later a dozen had appeared, and it became impossible to check the disease [...]."


From "Belsen Uncovered," Duckworth, London, 1946, by Derrick Sington, pages 117-118.











Yard at Belsen after British capture of the camp.



Of course, this unchecked Typhus epidemic, meant that the death rate at Belsen, was very high, and that there were plenty of emaciated prisoners and corpses to film, in order to feed the lie, that Jews had been systematically exterminated.















A few more reasonably well-fed Dachau inmates (photo taken on liberation).
















And, some emaciated corpses at Dachau (photo taken on liberation).




















Some emaciated corpses at Buchenwald (photo taken on liberation). This should be compared to the reasonably well-fed Buchenwald prisoners, pictured above.

Wednesday, December 17, 2008

Goodbye USA

Barack Obama has been proclaimed as America's First Jewish President. Was this statement made by European-Americans, all hell would break loose. Allegations of 'racism', anti-Semitism, probably even Holocaust-denial, would abound. Those who dared to suggest that the President of the USA was a tool of Organised Jewry, an agent of Zionism, and a willing bootboy of the New World Order, would be villified, hounded from their jobs and subjected to all manner of persecution.

However, this statement has come from highly placed Jews.

Read more here

Tuesday, December 9, 2008

Lifting the Blame on Spanish Colonists for Native American Deaths



http://www.davidduke.com/general/lifting-the-blame-of-spaniards-for-native-american-deaths_6327.html#more-6327

Lifting the Blame on Spanish Colonists for Native American Deaths

Ancestors of European Americans have long been blamed for the deaths of millions of native populations after the arrival of Columbus. It is commonly held that Americans of European descent are retroactively complicit in the widespread loss of life due to disease in the 16th century. This loss of millions of lives is viewed by many historians as deliberate. Such blaming has lead to militant Hispanic hatred of Whites in America and the rhetoric that Hispanic immigrants “have got to eliminate the gringo”, that they “have got to kill him, as well as expressed intentions to seize the American southwest, an area they call “Atzlan”.

A Mexican epidemiologist, Rodolfo Acuna-Soto, made some research discoveries that muddle claims of intentional genocide by the Spanish: Smallpox seems to have existed in America before the arrival of the Spanish colonists, and the epidemics of 1545 and 1576 “seem to be another disease altogether“. His work demonstrates how vitally important ongoing historical research is to reality and to the protection of the rights of innocent people in the 21st century, in this case, the right of European Americans to exist in America.
-Staff 2

http://discovermagazine.com/2006/feb/megadeath-in-mexico

Megadeath in Mexico

Epidemics followed the Spanish arrival in the New World, but the worst killer may have been a shadowy native—a killer that could still be out there.

by Bruce Stutz

published online February 21, 2006

When Hernando Cortés and his Spanish army of fewer than a thousand men stormed into Mexico in 1519, the native population numbered about 22 million. By the end of the century, following a series of devastating epidemics, only 2 million people remained. Even compared with the casualties of the Black Death, the mortality rate was extraordinarily high. Mexican epidemiologist Rodolfo Acuña-Soto refers to it as the time of “megadeath.” The toll forever altered the culture of Mesoamerica and branded the Spanish as the worst kind of conquerors, those from foreign lands who kill with their microbes as well as their swords.

The notion that European colonialists brought sickness when they came to the New World was well established by the 16th century. Native populations in the Americas lacked immunities to common European diseases like smallpox, measles, and mumps. Within 20 years of Columbus’s arrival, smallpox had wiped out at least half the people of the West Indies and had begun to spread to the South American mainland.

In 1565 a Spanish royal judge who had investigated his country’s colony in Mexico wrote:

It is certain that from the day that D. Hernando Cortés, the Marquis del Valle, entered this land, in the seven years, more or less, that he conquered and governed it, the natives suffered many deaths, and many terrible dealings, robberies and oppressions were inflicted on them, taking advantage of their persons and their lands, without order, weight nor measure; . . . the people diminished in great number, as much due to excessive taxes and mistreatment, as to illness and smallpox, such that now a very great and notable fraction of the people are gone. . . .

There seemed little reason to debate the nature of the plague: Even the Spanish admitted that European smallpox was the disease that devastated the conquered Aztec empire. Case closed.

Then, four centuries later, Acuña-Soto improbably decided to reopen the investigation. Some key pieces of information—details that had been sitting, ignored, in the archives—just didn’t add up. His studies of ancient documents revealed that the Aztecs were familiar with smallpox, perhaps even before Cortés arrived. They called it zahuatl. Spanish colonists wrote at the time that outbreaks of zahuatl occurred in 1520 and 1531 and, typical of smallpox, lasted about a year. As many as 8 million people died from those outbreaks. But the epidemic that appeared in 1545, followed by another in 1576, seemed to be another disease altogether. The Aztecs called those outbreaks by a separate name, cocolitzli. “For them, cocolitzli was something completely different and far more virulent,” Acuña-Soto says. “Cocolitzli brought incomparable devastation that passed readily from one region to the next and killed quickly.”

After 12 years of research, Acuña-Soto has come to agree with the Aztecs: The cocolitzli plagues of the mid-16th century probably had nothing to do with smallpox. In fact, they probably had little to do with the Spanish invasion. But they probably did have an origin that is worth knowing about in 2006.

[...]

Read the rest here.

Thursday, December 4, 2008

The real sin in the Garden of Eden - Not eating an apple, but seduction into sexual sin - Cain the biological offspring of Satan



http://thy-weapon-of-war.blogspot.com/2008/11/real-sin-in-garden-of-eden-not-eating.html

Note: I will be using the correct names for the Messiah and the Creator, Yahshua and Yahweh, respectively.

For the serious Christian and truth-seeker, this is not a light subject, but one of imperative and profound importance that will enable one to understand the true meaning and message of the Bible. The truth about the sin of Adam and Eve in the Garden of Eden is concealed by the use of figurative language in the Genesis account. Terms such as "tree" and "fruit" are used symbolically. It was not a literal snake that spoke to Eve, and tricked her into eating an apple. Upon close examination of the Genesis account and other Biblical texts in totality, it is clear that what occurred was the seduction of Adam and Eve into sexual sin by Satan. The product of this sin was Cain, the biological son of Satan. This event has defined the rest of history...ie, the war on earth between the children of Yahweh (the descendants of Adam) and the children of Satan (the descendants of Cain).

Genesis Account - Correct Understanding of the Text

Gen 2:17 (Yahweh speaking to Adam)
"But of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil, thou shalt not eat of it: for in the day that thou eatest thereof thou shalt surely die." (KJV)

Genesis 3:3 "But of the fruit of the tree which is in the midst of the garden, God hath said, Ye shall not eat of it, neither shall ye touch it, lest ye die." (KJV)

Genesis 3:13: "And the LORD God said unto the woman, What is this that thou hast done? And the woman said, The serpent beguiled me, and I did eat." (KJV)


Throughout the Bible, the term "tree" is used to symbolically refer to men, angels, or other persons. Examples include referring to the nation of Israel as the "olive tree", and Yahshua as the "tree of life", etc. There is disagreement among scholars as to whether the "trees" in the Garden were other humans, angels, or both. The "tree of the knowledge of good and evil" may refer to the fallen angel Satan, or a race of humans under his influence, and possibly even descended from him and of a satanic bloodline. Unlike the angels of Yahweh who know only good, Satan -- once a loyal servant of Yahweh, but who later rebelled -- knows both good and evil.

The word translated as "eat" in English in Genesis 2:17 and 3:3 above is from the Hebrew word "akal", which means "eat" literally or figuratively, but can also mean to "lay." The word translated as "touch" in English in Genesis 3:3 is from the Hebrew word "naga"(Strong's Hebrew word # 5060), which can be translated as "lay the hand upon", but can also be used euphemistically to mean "to lie with a woman". Both of these terms have sexual meanings and connotations.

Satan, either by himself or using humans under his influence, "beguiled" Eve (that is, sexually seduced her). The scriptures record that Adam then partook of this "fruit" as well, which most likely means that he had sexual relations with a female of the other human races in the garden.

Following their sin, Adam and Eve suddenly became aware and ashamed of their nakedness, and made clothes out of leaves to cover themselves. Would eating an apple cause this reaction? No, but a sin of a sexual nature certainly would. Furthermore, when 'God' pronounced punishment on Adam and Eve, among the punishments was that Eve would have great sorrow in childbirth.

Cain Not Listed as a Descendant of Adam - Was "of the Wicked One"

The Bible contains many genealogies of the descendants of Adam, such as those tracing the ancestry of Yahshua the Messiah all the way back to Adam. In chapter 5 of Genesis, a listing of the descendants of Adam is given. Neither there or anywhere else in the Bible is Cain ever listed among the descendants of Adam. Why? Because Adam was not his father.

The true father of Cain is attested to in the following passage:

1 John 3:8,12: "He that committeth sin is of the devil; for the devil sinneth from the beginning. For this purpose the Son of God was manifested, that he might destroy the works of the devil...Cain, who was of that wicked one, and slew his brother." (KJV)


Here the word translated "of" in the KJV is the Greek word #1537 in Strong's Concordance. When used implying a person, it means "a son of or offspring." Other translations, including the "Worldwide English" and "New English" translations, render the passage as "Cain, who was a child of the wicked one."

Some scholars say that based on the Dead Sea Scrolls, Genesis 4:1 has been tampered with, and should read:

"And Adam knew his wife Eve, who was pregnant by Sammael (Satan), and she conceived and bare Cain, and he was like the heavenly beings, and not like the earthly beings, and she said, I have gotten a man from the angel of the Lord."

Prophecy of Conflict Between the 'Seed of the Woman' and the 'Seed of the Serpent'

Yahweh ('God') pronounced judgement on the "serpent", Satan:

Genesis 3:15: "And I will put enmity between thee and the woman, and between thy seed and her seed; it shall bruise thy head, and thou shalt bruise his heel."


"Enmity" is defined as "hostility" or "hatred." The "seed" of the woman are the pure-blooded, non-mongrelized descendants of Adam and Eve, while the "seed" of the Serpent are the hybrid offspring of Satan via Cain. The latter part of the above passage predicts the victory of the seed of the woman over the seed of the serpent...ie, that the seed of Adam and Eve (ie, Yahshua the Messiah) would destroy Satan ("bruise his head"), while Satan would cause the death of Yahshua ("bruising his heel").

Identifying The Children of Cain

The descendants of Cain multiplied and became numerous, forming many tribes and nations, including the ancient Hittites, Amalekites, Edomites, and other Canaanite tribes, whom settled in the land encompassing modern-day Palestine. At the time of Yahshua, these descendants of Cain (many of them mongrelized Israelites of the tribe of Judah) were the bulk of the population living in the land of Judea, with only a small remnant of pure-blooded Israelites in the area. They controlled the civil and religious government of Judea, while technically under military rule from Rome. The religion of these Cainites was dominated by the Pharisees, and known at that time as the "tradition of the elders." It originated from Babylonian occultism, carried back to Judea by the remnant of Israelites that returned from captivity in Babylon. It is from these people and this religion that the modern-day "Jews" and "Judaism" trace their roots.

Yahshua condemned the Pharisees and the race of people to which they belonged for what they were -- a "race of vipers" and "of their father the devil." The Cainite Pharisees and "jews" of that day hated Yahshua and conspired to kill him.

Yahshua speaking to the Pharisees:

"Ye are of your father the devil, and the lusts of your father ye will do. He was a murderer from the beginning, and abode not in the truth, because there is no truth in him. (John 8:44)(KJV)

"Woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites!...Ye serpents, ye generation of vipers, how can ye escape the damnation of hell?...That upon you may come all the righteous blood shed upon the earth, from the blood of righteous Abel unto the blood of Zacharias son of Barachias, whom ye slew between the temple and the altar. Verily I say unto you, All these things shall come upon this generation. " (Matthew 23:29,33, 35-36)(KJV)


Note that "generation" in the above verse is from the Greek word "gennema" (Strong's # 1081), meaning "offspring". And how could Yahshua say that the generation (ie, race) of the Pharisees were responsible for the murder of Abel? Because the people of the Pharisees were the descendants of Cain.

The Cainite-Kenite-Canaanite-Edomite Jews - Satan's Counterfeit "Chosen People"

The goal of Satan since his rebellion and fall has been to be like Yahweh, take His place, and be worshipped as Yahweh. Therefore, Satan seeks to imitate and counterfeit the ways of Yahweh. So as Yahweh has children on the earth to do His will, Satan sought to have his own children who would do his will. The seed of the Serpent work to thwart the will of Yahweh and work to destroy the true children of Yahweh. The sons of Satan have been the primary persecutors of Yahweh's true children down through history. As Cain killed Abel, the Cainites have shed all righteous Adamite blood down through history (Matthew 23:35), including crucifying Yahshua.

Aside from an attempt to destroy Yahweh's true children through mongrelization and corruption of their genetics and prevent the incarnation of Yahshua, the incarnation of Satan into a literal seedline was an attempt to replace the true children of Yahweh with Satan's counterfeit "chosen people" -- ie, the passing off of the Cainite Jews as Israelites. Knowing Yahweh's plan beforehand, Satan even positioned the Cainites in the promised land before both Abraham and the Israelites arrived. Yahweh responded by commanding the children of Israel to completely destroy the Cainite tribes in the land.

The Parable of the Sower

In the 13th chapter of the book of Matthew is recorded a parable Yahshua gave explaining the kingdom of Yahweh. In verse 35 He states "I will open my mouth in parables; I will utter things which have been kept secret from the foundation of the world."

He told the story of a man who sowed good seed in a field, but while he slept, an enemy came and sowed tares among the wheat. His servants asked him if they should go and gather the tares, but the sower said no because in doing so they might also pull up some of the wheat, and said rather let both grow until the time of harvest when both would be gathered, with the wheat stored in the barn and the tares burned.

Yahshua explained the meaning of this parable to His disciples, as recorded in Matthew 13:38-39:

"The field is the world; the good seed are the children of the kingdom; but the tares are the children of the wicked one; The enemy that sowed them is the devil; the harvest is the end of the world; and the reapers are the angels. As therefore the tares are gathered and burned in the fire; so shall it be in the end of this world."


Conclusion

As the Biblical texts make abundantly clear, there are literal-physical children of Yahweh and literal-physiological-genetic children of Satan on the earth, engaged in a battle for control of the planet. The race of Adam, the white race, are a special creation, and the very children of Yahweh. Their purpose is to take dominion of the earth and bring in the kingdom of Yahweh, and defeat Satan, who was reigning on the earth prior to the creation of Adam. Satan, seeking to thwart this plan, has attempted to corrupt and destroy the race of Adam by mongrelization, first in the Garden of Eden, and continuing from that point onwards. But through Yahshua, the "son of man" (ie, descendant of Adam) and son of Yahweh, Yahweh has obtained ultimate victory over Satan for His children. The time of the "harvest" is now closing in, and Yahweh will use His children to completely destroy the children of the serpent.

Resources:

THE CAIN / SATANIC SEED LINE by Pastor Bertrand L. Comparet

THE TWO SEEDS OF GENESIS 3:15

WHAT WAS THE REAL SIN IN THE GARDEN OF EDEN?

------------------------------------------------------------------
Related Articles:

The myth of the "brotherhood" of humanity; Adam not the first man, but father of only the white race

Racial origin of the "Jews"; not Israelites, but descendants of Khazars, Edomites, Canaanites, Cain, and ultimately Satan