Pages

Thursday, December 25, 2008

No "extermination camps" on German soil (or elsewhere in German-occupied territory) - Typhus epidemics the cause of mass deaths and emaciated bodies

source: http://guardian.150m.com/holocaust/why-believe.htm by way of seekingtruthnews

So, why do people believe in the holocaust?

Most people have been shown the film footage taken by American/British propaganda teams who accompanied troops as they liberated the Bergen, Belsen, Buchenwald, and Dachau, concentration camps.

The footage, especially from the Belsen camp, features large numbers of emaciated prisoners and corpses.

At this point, nearly everyone is deliberately (mis)led to the (false) conclusion that Jews were exterminated by gas chambers.

That this conclusion is false, is clear, if you are aware of the universally agreed fact, that there were no extermination camps in Germany. Even the extremist, Simon Wiesenthal, admitted this (in a letter to the respected British periodical Books and Bookmen, April 1975, p5, where he says "there were no extermination camps on German soil..."). No historian, Jew or otherwise, any longer claims that there were extermination camps in Germany (the Jew historians still claim that there were extermination camps, but now they claim that they were all located in Poland).

In particular, this means that there was no genocide, and no gas-chambers, at the camps Bergen, Belsen, Buchenwald or Dachau (as these camps were in Germany).

So, the above mentioned film footage from these German camps cannot be evidence for genocide, because, according to ALL the historians, there were no extermination camps in Germany

Clearly then, this US film footage DOES NOT, and NEVER DID, prove genocide of Jews.

So, the emaciated prisoners and corpses shown in the US film footage, had to have some other cause, or causes.

In fact, the other causes have long been known, but hidden by the Jews. Generally, the Germans managed to adequately feed the prisoners of the concentration camps, even with the transport system under sustained attack. Many photos are available which show thousands of reasonably well-fed prisoners. For example, this photo from Dachau (taken on liberation):
















Or, this photo from Buchenwald (taken on liberation).


















Or, this photo from Birkenau (Auschwitz) taken on liberation.














What actually happened, was that procedures aimed at holding various diseases in check, broke down under the pressures of war. The main killer, was Typhus. Typhus is spread by lice. Zyklon-B was an insecticide used to kill the lice that spread Typhus. The Typhus epidemics that raged through the camps (in both the first and second world wars) killed many thousands. If you suffer from Typhus, your body wastes away and you look as if you are starving to death. Typhus, is the reason for most of the severely emaciated prisoners and corpses.

Typhus, explains the mixture of severely emaciated prisoners and healthy prisoners. Those who caught the disease, became severely emaciated, and often died, those who didn't, remained reasonably healthy prisoners.












British guard post at entrance to Belsen camp.



A political prisoner at Belsen, stated:

"Towards the end of February 1945 my own situation changed completely.

By that time typhus had become a serious danger for the whole camp. It was the species of typhus which is transmitted by lice. At one time all the transports which arrived at Belsen had had to pass through a "human laundry" and this disinfection seems to have been effective enough to keep the camp free from lice until the autumn of 1944.

At the end of October a big transport had, for the first time, been admitted to the camp without being disinfected, because there had been some damage to the machinery of the shower-baths. Unfortunately the people of this transport were louse carriers, and from that day the lice gradually spread over the whole camp. [...] Typhus broke out in Camp I about the end of January. At first there were only a few cases, but a month later a dozen had appeared, and it became impossible to check the disease [...]."


From "Belsen Uncovered," Duckworth, London, 1946, by Derrick Sington, pages 117-118.











Yard at Belsen after British capture of the camp.



Of course, this unchecked Typhus epidemic, meant that the death rate at Belsen, was very high, and that there were plenty of emaciated prisoners and corpses to film, in order to feed the lie, that Jews had been systematically exterminated.















A few more reasonably well-fed Dachau inmates (photo taken on liberation).
















And, some emaciated corpses at Dachau (photo taken on liberation).




















Some emaciated corpses at Buchenwald (photo taken on liberation). This should be compared to the reasonably well-fed Buchenwald prisoners, pictured above.

Wednesday, December 17, 2008

Goodbye USA

Barack Obama has been proclaimed as America's First Jewish President. Was this statement made by European-Americans, all hell would break loose. Allegations of 'racism', anti-Semitism, probably even Holocaust-denial, would abound. Those who dared to suggest that the President of the USA was a tool of Organised Jewry, an agent of Zionism, and a willing bootboy of the New World Order, would be villified, hounded from their jobs and subjected to all manner of persecution.

However, this statement has come from highly placed Jews.

Read more here

Tuesday, December 9, 2008

Lifting the Blame on Spanish Colonists for Native American Deaths



http://www.davidduke.com/general/lifting-the-blame-of-spaniards-for-native-american-deaths_6327.html#more-6327

Lifting the Blame on Spanish Colonists for Native American Deaths

Ancestors of European Americans have long been blamed for the deaths of millions of native populations after the arrival of Columbus. It is commonly held that Americans of European descent are retroactively complicit in the widespread loss of life due to disease in the 16th century. This loss of millions of lives is viewed by many historians as deliberate. Such blaming has lead to militant Hispanic hatred of Whites in America and the rhetoric that Hispanic immigrants “have got to eliminate the gringo”, that they “have got to kill him, as well as expressed intentions to seize the American southwest, an area they call “Atzlan”.

A Mexican epidemiologist, Rodolfo Acuna-Soto, made some research discoveries that muddle claims of intentional genocide by the Spanish: Smallpox seems to have existed in America before the arrival of the Spanish colonists, and the epidemics of 1545 and 1576 “seem to be another disease altogether“. His work demonstrates how vitally important ongoing historical research is to reality and to the protection of the rights of innocent people in the 21st century, in this case, the right of European Americans to exist in America.
-Staff 2

http://discovermagazine.com/2006/feb/megadeath-in-mexico

Megadeath in Mexico

Epidemics followed the Spanish arrival in the New World, but the worst killer may have been a shadowy native—a killer that could still be out there.

by Bruce Stutz

published online February 21, 2006

When Hernando Cortés and his Spanish army of fewer than a thousand men stormed into Mexico in 1519, the native population numbered about 22 million. By the end of the century, following a series of devastating epidemics, only 2 million people remained. Even compared with the casualties of the Black Death, the mortality rate was extraordinarily high. Mexican epidemiologist Rodolfo Acuña-Soto refers to it as the time of “megadeath.” The toll forever altered the culture of Mesoamerica and branded the Spanish as the worst kind of conquerors, those from foreign lands who kill with their microbes as well as their swords.

The notion that European colonialists brought sickness when they came to the New World was well established by the 16th century. Native populations in the Americas lacked immunities to common European diseases like smallpox, measles, and mumps. Within 20 years of Columbus’s arrival, smallpox had wiped out at least half the people of the West Indies and had begun to spread to the South American mainland.

In 1565 a Spanish royal judge who had investigated his country’s colony in Mexico wrote:

It is certain that from the day that D. Hernando Cortés, the Marquis del Valle, entered this land, in the seven years, more or less, that he conquered and governed it, the natives suffered many deaths, and many terrible dealings, robberies and oppressions were inflicted on them, taking advantage of their persons and their lands, without order, weight nor measure; . . . the people diminished in great number, as much due to excessive taxes and mistreatment, as to illness and smallpox, such that now a very great and notable fraction of the people are gone. . . .

There seemed little reason to debate the nature of the plague: Even the Spanish admitted that European smallpox was the disease that devastated the conquered Aztec empire. Case closed.

Then, four centuries later, Acuña-Soto improbably decided to reopen the investigation. Some key pieces of information—details that had been sitting, ignored, in the archives—just didn’t add up. His studies of ancient documents revealed that the Aztecs were familiar with smallpox, perhaps even before Cortés arrived. They called it zahuatl. Spanish colonists wrote at the time that outbreaks of zahuatl occurred in 1520 and 1531 and, typical of smallpox, lasted about a year. As many as 8 million people died from those outbreaks. But the epidemic that appeared in 1545, followed by another in 1576, seemed to be another disease altogether. The Aztecs called those outbreaks by a separate name, cocolitzli. “For them, cocolitzli was something completely different and far more virulent,” Acuña-Soto says. “Cocolitzli brought incomparable devastation that passed readily from one region to the next and killed quickly.”

After 12 years of research, Acuña-Soto has come to agree with the Aztecs: The cocolitzli plagues of the mid-16th century probably had nothing to do with smallpox. In fact, they probably had little to do with the Spanish invasion. But they probably did have an origin that is worth knowing about in 2006.

[...]

Read the rest here.

Thursday, December 4, 2008

The real sin in the Garden of Eden - Not eating an apple, but seduction into sexual sin - Cain the biological offspring of Satan



http://thy-weapon-of-war.blogspot.com/2008/11/real-sin-in-garden-of-eden-not-eating.html

Note: I will be using the correct names for the Messiah and the Creator, Yahshua and Yahweh, respectively.

For the serious Christian and truth-seeker, this is not a light subject, but one of imperative and profound importance that will enable one to understand the true meaning and message of the Bible. The truth about the sin of Adam and Eve in the Garden of Eden is concealed by the use of figurative language in the Genesis account. Terms such as "tree" and "fruit" are used symbolically. It was not a literal snake that spoke to Eve, and tricked her into eating an apple. Upon close examination of the Genesis account and other Biblical texts in totality, it is clear that what occurred was the seduction of Adam and Eve into sexual sin by Satan. The product of this sin was Cain, the biological son of Satan. This event has defined the rest of history...ie, the war on earth between the children of Yahweh (the descendants of Adam) and the children of Satan (the descendants of Cain).

Genesis Account - Correct Understanding of the Text

Gen 2:17 (Yahweh speaking to Adam)
"But of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil, thou shalt not eat of it: for in the day that thou eatest thereof thou shalt surely die." (KJV)

Genesis 3:3 "But of the fruit of the tree which is in the midst of the garden, God hath said, Ye shall not eat of it, neither shall ye touch it, lest ye die." (KJV)

Genesis 3:13: "And the LORD God said unto the woman, What is this that thou hast done? And the woman said, The serpent beguiled me, and I did eat." (KJV)


Throughout the Bible, the term "tree" is used to symbolically refer to men, angels, or other persons. Examples include referring to the nation of Israel as the "olive tree", and Yahshua as the "tree of life", etc. There is disagreement among scholars as to whether the "trees" in the Garden were other humans, angels, or both. The "tree of the knowledge of good and evil" may refer to the fallen angel Satan, or a race of humans under his influence, and possibly even descended from him and of a satanic bloodline. Unlike the angels of Yahweh who know only good, Satan -- once a loyal servant of Yahweh, but who later rebelled -- knows both good and evil.

The word translated as "eat" in English in Genesis 2:17 and 3:3 above is from the Hebrew word "akal", which means "eat" literally or figuratively, but can also mean to "lay." The word translated as "touch" in English in Genesis 3:3 is from the Hebrew word "naga"(Strong's Hebrew word # 5060), which can be translated as "lay the hand upon", but can also be used euphemistically to mean "to lie with a woman". Both of these terms have sexual meanings and connotations.

Satan, either by himself or using humans under his influence, "beguiled" Eve (that is, sexually seduced her). The scriptures record that Adam then partook of this "fruit" as well, which most likely means that he had sexual relations with a female of the other human races in the garden.

Following their sin, Adam and Eve suddenly became aware and ashamed of their nakedness, and made clothes out of leaves to cover themselves. Would eating an apple cause this reaction? No, but a sin of a sexual nature certainly would. Furthermore, when 'God' pronounced punishment on Adam and Eve, among the punishments was that Eve would have great sorrow in childbirth.

Cain Not Listed as a Descendant of Adam - Was "of the Wicked One"

The Bible contains many genealogies of the descendants of Adam, such as those tracing the ancestry of Yahshua the Messiah all the way back to Adam. In chapter 5 of Genesis, a listing of the descendants of Adam is given. Neither there or anywhere else in the Bible is Cain ever listed among the descendants of Adam. Why? Because Adam was not his father.

The true father of Cain is attested to in the following passage:

1 John 3:8,12: "He that committeth sin is of the devil; for the devil sinneth from the beginning. For this purpose the Son of God was manifested, that he might destroy the works of the devil...Cain, who was of that wicked one, and slew his brother." (KJV)


Here the word translated "of" in the KJV is the Greek word #1537 in Strong's Concordance. When used implying a person, it means "a son of or offspring." Other translations, including the "Worldwide English" and "New English" translations, render the passage as "Cain, who was a child of the wicked one."

Some scholars say that based on the Dead Sea Scrolls, Genesis 4:1 has been tampered with, and should read:

"And Adam knew his wife Eve, who was pregnant by Sammael (Satan), and she conceived and bare Cain, and he was like the heavenly beings, and not like the earthly beings, and she said, I have gotten a man from the angel of the Lord."

Prophecy of Conflict Between the 'Seed of the Woman' and the 'Seed of the Serpent'

Yahweh ('God') pronounced judgement on the "serpent", Satan:

Genesis 3:15: "And I will put enmity between thee and the woman, and between thy seed and her seed; it shall bruise thy head, and thou shalt bruise his heel."


"Enmity" is defined as "hostility" or "hatred." The "seed" of the woman are the pure-blooded, non-mongrelized descendants of Adam and Eve, while the "seed" of the Serpent are the hybrid offspring of Satan via Cain. The latter part of the above passage predicts the victory of the seed of the woman over the seed of the serpent...ie, that the seed of Adam and Eve (ie, Yahshua the Messiah) would destroy Satan ("bruise his head"), while Satan would cause the death of Yahshua ("bruising his heel").

Identifying The Children of Cain

The descendants of Cain multiplied and became numerous, forming many tribes and nations, including the ancient Hittites, Amalekites, Edomites, and other Canaanite tribes, whom settled in the land encompassing modern-day Palestine. At the time of Yahshua, these descendants of Cain (many of them mongrelized Israelites of the tribe of Judah) were the bulk of the population living in the land of Judea, with only a small remnant of pure-blooded Israelites in the area. They controlled the civil and religious government of Judea, while technically under military rule from Rome. The religion of these Cainites was dominated by the Pharisees, and known at that time as the "tradition of the elders." It originated from Babylonian occultism, carried back to Judea by the remnant of Israelites that returned from captivity in Babylon. It is from these people and this religion that the modern-day "Jews" and "Judaism" trace their roots.

Yahshua condemned the Pharisees and the race of people to which they belonged for what they were -- a "race of vipers" and "of their father the devil." The Cainite Pharisees and "jews" of that day hated Yahshua and conspired to kill him.

Yahshua speaking to the Pharisees:

"Ye are of your father the devil, and the lusts of your father ye will do. He was a murderer from the beginning, and abode not in the truth, because there is no truth in him. (John 8:44)(KJV)

"Woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites!...Ye serpents, ye generation of vipers, how can ye escape the damnation of hell?...That upon you may come all the righteous blood shed upon the earth, from the blood of righteous Abel unto the blood of Zacharias son of Barachias, whom ye slew between the temple and the altar. Verily I say unto you, All these things shall come upon this generation. " (Matthew 23:29,33, 35-36)(KJV)


Note that "generation" in the above verse is from the Greek word "gennema" (Strong's # 1081), meaning "offspring". And how could Yahshua say that the generation (ie, race) of the Pharisees were responsible for the murder of Abel? Because the people of the Pharisees were the descendants of Cain.

The Cainite-Kenite-Canaanite-Edomite Jews - Satan's Counterfeit "Chosen People"

The goal of Satan since his rebellion and fall has been to be like Yahweh, take His place, and be worshipped as Yahweh. Therefore, Satan seeks to imitate and counterfeit the ways of Yahweh. So as Yahweh has children on the earth to do His will, Satan sought to have his own children who would do his will. The seed of the Serpent work to thwart the will of Yahweh and work to destroy the true children of Yahweh. The sons of Satan have been the primary persecutors of Yahweh's true children down through history. As Cain killed Abel, the Cainites have shed all righteous Adamite blood down through history (Matthew 23:35), including crucifying Yahshua.

Aside from an attempt to destroy Yahweh's true children through mongrelization and corruption of their genetics and prevent the incarnation of Yahshua, the incarnation of Satan into a literal seedline was an attempt to replace the true children of Yahweh with Satan's counterfeit "chosen people" -- ie, the passing off of the Cainite Jews as Israelites. Knowing Yahweh's plan beforehand, Satan even positioned the Cainites in the promised land before both Abraham and the Israelites arrived. Yahweh responded by commanding the children of Israel to completely destroy the Cainite tribes in the land.

The Parable of the Sower

In the 13th chapter of the book of Matthew is recorded a parable Yahshua gave explaining the kingdom of Yahweh. In verse 35 He states "I will open my mouth in parables; I will utter things which have been kept secret from the foundation of the world."

He told the story of a man who sowed good seed in a field, but while he slept, an enemy came and sowed tares among the wheat. His servants asked him if they should go and gather the tares, but the sower said no because in doing so they might also pull up some of the wheat, and said rather let both grow until the time of harvest when both would be gathered, with the wheat stored in the barn and the tares burned.

Yahshua explained the meaning of this parable to His disciples, as recorded in Matthew 13:38-39:

"The field is the world; the good seed are the children of the kingdom; but the tares are the children of the wicked one; The enemy that sowed them is the devil; the harvest is the end of the world; and the reapers are the angels. As therefore the tares are gathered and burned in the fire; so shall it be in the end of this world."


Conclusion

As the Biblical texts make abundantly clear, there are literal-physical children of Yahweh and literal-physiological-genetic children of Satan on the earth, engaged in a battle for control of the planet. The race of Adam, the white race, are a special creation, and the very children of Yahweh. Their purpose is to take dominion of the earth and bring in the kingdom of Yahweh, and defeat Satan, who was reigning on the earth prior to the creation of Adam. Satan, seeking to thwart this plan, has attempted to corrupt and destroy the race of Adam by mongrelization, first in the Garden of Eden, and continuing from that point onwards. But through Yahshua, the "son of man" (ie, descendant of Adam) and son of Yahweh, Yahweh has obtained ultimate victory over Satan for His children. The time of the "harvest" is now closing in, and Yahweh will use His children to completely destroy the children of the serpent.

Resources:

THE CAIN / SATANIC SEED LINE by Pastor Bertrand L. Comparet

THE TWO SEEDS OF GENESIS 3:15

WHAT WAS THE REAL SIN IN THE GARDEN OF EDEN?

------------------------------------------------------------------
Related Articles:

The myth of the "brotherhood" of humanity; Adam not the first man, but father of only the white race

Racial origin of the "Jews"; not Israelites, but descendants of Khazars, Edomites, Canaanites, Cain, and ultimately Satan

Monday, November 24, 2008

The Flood of Noah Was Not Worldwide

http://thy-weapon-of-war.blogspot.com/2008/11/flood-of-noah-was-not-worldwide.html



Introduction

The idea of a worldwide flood at the time of Noah is a misconception arising out of inexact translations and a misinterpretation of the Biblical text. As supported by a correct translation and understanding of the Biblical text, history, archaeology, logic, and the best available scientific evidence, the flood of Noah's day was a localized flood in the area of the Tarim Basin, located north of Tibet in modern-day western China.

Genesis account - Correct translation - Hebrew word translated as "earth" should be understood as "land" or "country"

According to modern-day translations, the text in Genesis records that waters were on the face of the whole "earth" (Gen. 7:17), and that all life was to be destroyed from the face of the "earth" (Gen. 7:4). The word translated as "earth" in these passages is the Hebrew word "erets" (Strong's Hebrew word #776, check in Strong's Concordance here).

The Hebrew word "erets" can refer to the entire world or planet earth, but also can be translated to mean "country", "field", "ground", and "land" (check in Hebrew lexicon here). "Erets" is rarely used in the Bible to refer to the entire planet, and most often used to refer to a limited geographical area -- eg, it is translated "land" 1,476 times, "country" 140 times, and "ground" 96 times in the Old Testament.

For example, in Genesis 4:14 the King James translation says that Cain was driven "from the face of the earth" when punished by God. Cain was not banished to another planet, but rather from the land or country where Adam and Eve lived.

Historical Evidence - Ancient civilizations have uninterrupted history going back to and before flood

According to the Bible, the flood in Genesis occurred in approximately 2345 B.C. At this period in history, there were many great civilizations existing on the earth. Based upon written historical records and archaeological evidence, we know that several of these civilizations, including those of Egypt, China, and Sumer (Mesopotamia), have an uninterrupted history going back until and before the time of Noah's flood. Egypt, for instance, has an uninterrupted line of Kings from 2000 B.C. going back to at least 3000 B.C. These civilizations were never wiped out by any worldwide flood.

The problem of gathering and storing the entire planet's animals on the ark

Noah was commanded to take two of each species of animal onto the ark. Assuming Noah had to gather animals from all over the earth, are we really to believe that Noah travelled to South America, Australia, Antarctica, and every continent on earth to find every single species of animal, bird, and insect? Further, the ark was woefully small to accommodate for living space and food storage (for almost a year) for earth's estimated 1 million species of mammals, birds, reptiles, and insects.

Understanding that the flood was localized to the area where Noah and his countrymen lived (a region hypothetically the size of the state of Montana or Germany), then the task of taking all species within that area onto the ark becomes possible, and quite feasible.

The problem of all modern human races originating from Noah's family

According to the misinterpretation of the story, all people of the earth were destroyed except for Noah, his wife, and his three sons and their wives. Therefore, we are lead to believe that all the people on earth today are descended from these eight survivors of the flood. But how could Noah's sons and their wives possibly produce the variety in the human races today -- blacks, whites, asians, etc? This is no problem for those who also mistakenly believe that all the human races could have originated from Adam and Eve. As I discussed in a previous article, this is genetically and biologically impossible, and not supported by the Biblical text. The truth is that Adam and Eve are the ancestors of the white race only. And there were other humans on the earth prior to the creation of Adam and Eve, which is why, for instance, Cain feared other people would kill him after he was banished from the garden of Eden, and how Cain was able to find a wife, have his own descendants, and build a city after being banished from Adam & Eve and their descendants.



Location of the Flood

The Bible records that after Adam and Eve were banished from the garden of Eden, they were driven to the east. This is where the descendants of Adam, including Noah, dwelled at the time of the flood. In order to locate this area, we must first know where the garden of Eden was located. Based on ancient extra-biblical sources -- including Chinese, Indian, and Persian traditions -- and the description of Eden given in the Biblical texts, Eden was a land east of Mesopotamia notable for having four rivers flowing through it. Using this evidence, the location of the garden of Eden is most likely the area of the Pamir Plateau, located northeast of the Hindu-Cush Mountains in modern-day Eastern Turkistan. Just east of the Pamir Plateau is a vast area approximately 650 miles long by 350 miles wide rimmed by high mountains known as the Tarim Basin, located in modern day western China. On a related note, one of the ongoing "mysteries" (to many archaeologists) was the discovery in the 1990s of mummies with blonde hair of Nordic-European stock in the Tarim Basin.

Conclusion

This, along with other misunderstandings of the Biblical texts -- including the myth of an earth that is only 6,000 years old and the erroneous belief in the common ancestry of all the human races -- are areas that give support to the notion that the Biblical texts are historically inaccurate, at odds with science, and unreliable as sources -- having disastrous effect upon the faith of millions of people in 'God' and the Bible.

When translated and interpreted correctly, the Biblical texts are credible, and consistent with history, archaeology, and science.


Resources:

'NOAH'S FLOOD WAS NOT WORLD WIDE' by Pastor Bertrand L. Comparet

Facts & Fictions Regarding Noah's Flood

'AS IN THE DAYS OF NOAH' by Dr. Wesley A. Swift (see second half of article)

'The Flood of Noah' by Pastor Mark Downey

Tuesday, November 18, 2008

"How 9/11 was done" - 9/11 attacks carried out by Mossad



Excellent detailed analysis on how the Mossad carried out 9/11 on a logistical and operational level.

http://how911wasdone.blogspot.com/

How 9/11 was done

28 oktober 2008

Prologue

9/11 was a master plot, concocted by a handfull of Israelis and dual passport Americans and carried out by the resources of the Mossad.

Larry Silverstein buys a nearly worthless WTC building complex (worthless due to the asbestos the buildings were stuffed with and needed to be cleaned up, the cost of which may have rivaled the value of the buildings themselves) weeks before 9/11, makes sure it is over-ensured against terrorist acts, tellingly with a german ensurer, next hires an israeli security firm and in the weekend before 9/11 cuts off power in all the WTC buildings with 'maintenance' as an excuse, so the buildings are virtually empty. At that moment the coast is clear to let a team of demolition experts from the israeli army led by Peer Segalovitz into the WTC buildings. These charges plus detonators had been prepared at the premises of the Urban Moving Systems company, a Mossad front. During this weekend these prepared charges were loaded into vans, driven into the basement of WTC next to the elevator shaft, unloaded into the elevator, and lifted onto the roof of the elevator through the openening in the elevator ceiling. Next the elevator moved from floor to floor while charges where being attached to the columns as displayed in this video from 0:22 onwards. The detonators of these charges were radiographic controlled and finally detonated from WTC7 on the day of 9/11.

Fast backward, Hamburg 54 Marienstrasse, july 2000, 22:40. Mohamed Atta, Al Shehhi and Jarrah (who were later blamed of being the pilots of flight 11, 175 and 93 respectively), who share the apartment hear the ringing of the door bell. Jarrah opens the door, 5 masked men make their way into the apartment with drawn pistols. The 3 Arabs are forced to lay on the ground. Their passports are confiscated, next the 3 men are made unconscious with some liquid and strangled to death afterwards. The bodies are carried out of the apartment into a van and driven off towards a desolate spot at the boarding of the Elbe river outside Hamburg, 1 kilometer north of Borstel and disposed of into the river with a bag filled with stones tied to their feet. The 3 passports are now in the possession of the agents of the Mossad, who carried out the raid on the apartment and 3 Arabs have vanished without anybody knowing that they are dead. Not long after the raid the 3 passports are given to 3 israeli agents who were selected on having some resemblance with the 3 Arabs just killed. They make for America soon afterwards in the summer of 2000 and start laying a trail at flight schools, posing with the stolen identities from the 3 Arabs killed.

Years earlier the israeli Michael Goff working for PTech, an arab owned software company that developes key enterprise software for many government institutions like Norad and FAA, using his secure channel with another israeli Amit Yoran, somehow manages to give israeli army computer programmers access to this critical computer code. It was due to this manipulation that the hijackings on 9/11 remained unnoticed by the flight controller of Norad. Once this was in place the planes could be taken over by remote control and flown into the World Trade Center.

The hijacking of airliners by remote control had been tested as a dress rehearsel for 9/11 on the Egypt Air flight 990 that crashed into the Atlantic on october 31, 1999.

Now everything was in place to commit the crime of the century. On the day of 9/11 the israeli stand-ins for the 'arab hijackers' showed up at the predestined departure airports to make sure they were captured on surveillance camera's. The crucial point here is that the security at both the departure airports was in hands of an israeli firm, a subsidiary of the dutch based but israeli owned ICTS led by a fellow named Menahem Atzmon. And this is crucial: Atzmon used to be a collegue with Olmert in 1998. So there you have the link between the 9/11 operative level (an airport security firm) and the highest level of israeli politics. What happened on the morning of 9/11 was that after the israeli stand-ins were captured on camera, they left the airport via a side entrance and the show could begin. Minutes after the planes became airborn somebody somehow was able to send a signal to the planes via the transponders, causing the control panels to be disabled and the flight destination altered. What happened was that an anti-hijack system was activated (code word 'home run') and the regular pilot was put out of control. This pilot will probably have tried frantically to regain control of his aircraft. It is not very likely he will have told his passengers about the new situation since that would only cause panic. The passengers probably suspected nothing and hence had no reason to make any phone calls to their relatives. And while the 9/11 passengers unsuspecting travel towards their immanent deaths, on the ground israeli agents carry out phone calls to relatives of the passengers that were still in the air, using voice morphing technology and caller-ID spoofing and thus planted the Arabs-did-it-deception in the public consciousness. The sound samples necessary to carry out the fake telephone calls had been obtained via the israeli infiltration of american telephone networks by israeli firms like Amdocs and Verint. By the time that the passengers were puzzled as they discerned the New York sky line it was already too late. BANG!!

Meanwhile on the other side of the Hudson river the members of the israeli team that planted the demolition charges were waiting for things to happen. And while the rest of New York experienced in horror the events that were unfolding that day, the demoliton experts were celebrating and high-fiving. The plot had worked out magnificently.

Introduction

Ok, I admit. Some elements in this story are speculative. But the story is an coherent educated speculation. Myriads of web sites exist that expose the inconsistencies in the official story, that obviously is a fraud. This story offers an integral explanation of what could have happened and in all likelyhood did happen at 9/11 as there can be hardly any doubt about who was behind 9/11 if one rejects the official story. Some elements remain vague, like what happened exactly to WTC7, flight77, flight93 or Mohamed Atta. But these questions are of academic interest only. It's clear who was behind 9/11 and what happened in detail with WTC-1/2 and the planes. That is enough. Here's where most people got killed. The rest of the plot can be uncovered by a tribunal.

If you are interested to learn what material is available to back this story up, please read on.

Many people realise that the official explanation of the 9/11 events is implausible. Prof. David Ray Griffin for instance has written several books detailing what is implausible about the official story, hereafter dubbed as the Arab Conspiracy Theory (ACT). The aim of this blog will be to present a competing conspiracy theory, dubbed as the Israeli Conspiracy Theory (ICT) to see who might win this competion. I do not claim to present much original material, almost all of the ICT proposed here is based on the work of Christopher Bollyn, see this link for his theory about who was behind 9/11. My added value will be to collect additional material from the net, like youtube videos and the like and to add some ideas and speculations of my own.


Read the rest here.

Thursday, November 13, 2008

White Guilt Finally Over!



http://www.rense.com/general84/white.htm

White Guilt Is Now Dead

By Tom Adkins
11-12-8

Look at my fellow conservatives! There they go, glumly shuffling along, depressed by the election aftermath. Not me. I'm virtually euphoric. Don't get me wrong. I'm not thrilled with America 's flirtation with neo socialism. But there's a massive silver lining in those magical clouds that lofted Barak Obama to the Presidency. For today, without a shred of intellectually legitimate opposition, I can loudly proclaim to America : The Era of White Guilt is over.

This seemingly impossible event occurred because the vast majority of white Americans didn't give a fluff about skin color, and enthusiastically pulled the voting lever for a black man. Not just any black man. A very liberal black man who spent his early career race-hustling banks, praying in a racist church for 20 years, and actively worked with America-hating domestic terrorists. Wow! Some resume! Yet they made Barak Obama their leader. Therefore, as of Nov 4th, 2008, white guilt is dead.

For over a century, the millstone of white guilt hung around our necks, retribution for slave-owning predecessors. In the 60s, American liberals began yanking that millstone while sticking a fork in the eye of black Americans, exacerbating the racial divide to extort a socialist solution. But if a black man can become President, exactly what significant barrier is left? The election of Barak Obama absolutely destroys the entire validation of liberal white guilt. The dragon is hereby slain.

So today, I'm feeling a little "uppity," if you will. From this day forward, my tolerance level for having my skin color hustled is now exactly ZERO. And it's time to clean house. No more Reverend Wright's "God Damn America ," Al Sharpton's Church of Perpetual Victimization , or Jesse Jackson's rainbow racism. Cornell West? You're a fraud. Go home. All those "black studies" programs that taught kids to hate whitey? You must now thank Whitey. And I want that on the final.

Congressional Black Caucus? Irrelevant. Maxine Waters? Shut up. ACORN? Outlawed. Black Panthers? Go home and pet your kitty. Black separatists? Find another nation that offers better dreams. Go ahead. I'm waiting.

Gangsta rappers? Start praising America . Begin with the Pledge of Allegiance. And please.no more ebonics. Speak English, and who knows where you might end up? Oh, yeah.pull up your pants. Your underwear is showing. You look stupid.

To those Eurosnots who forged entire careers hating America ? I'm still waiting for the first black French President.

And let me offer an equal opportunity whupping. I've always despised lazy white people. Now, I can talk smack about lazy black people. You're poor because you quit school, did drugs, had three kids with three different fathers, and refuse to work. So when you plop your Colt 45-swilling, Oprah watchin' butt on the couch and complain"Da Man is keepin' me down," allow me to inform you: Da Man is now black. You have no excuses.

No more quotas. No more handouts. No more stealing my money because someone's great-great-great-great grandparents suffered actual pain and misery at the hands of people I have no relation to, and personally revile.

It's time to toss that massive, obsolete race-hustle machine upon the heap of the other stupid 60s ideas. Drag it over there, by wife swapping, next to dope-smoking. Plenty of room right between free love and cop-killing. Careful.don't trip on streaking. There ya go, don't be gentle. Just dump it. Wash your hands. It's filthy.

In fact, Obama's ascension created a gargantuan irony. How can you sell class envy and American unfairness when you and your black wife went to Ivy League schools, got high-paying jobs, became millionaires, bought a mansion, and got elected President? How unfair is that??? Now, Like a delicious O'Henry tale, Obama's spread-the-wealth campaign rendered itself moot by it's own victory! America is officially a meritocracy. Obama's election has validated American conservatism!

So, listen carefully.Wham!!!

That's the sound of my foot kicking the door shut on the era of white guilt. The rites have been muttered, the carcass lowered, dirt shoveled, and tombstone erected. White guilt is dead and buried.

However, despite my glee, there's apparently one small, rabid bastion of American racism remaining. Black Americans voted 96% for Barak Obama. Hmmm. In a color-blind world, shouldn't that be 50-50? Tonight, every black person should ask forgiveness for their apparent racism and prejudice towards white people. Maybe it's time to start spreading the guilt around.

Monday, November 10, 2008

The Assassination of General George Patton; His Change of Heart on WWII, Warning Against Communism, Opposition to Genocidal Occupation of Germany



http://thy-weapon-of-war.blogspot.com/2008/11/george-pattons-change-of-heart-on-wwii.html

source: http://www.israelect.com/ChurchOfTrueIsrael/patton.html

GENERAL PATTON'S WARNING

Despite his disagreement with official policy, Patton followed the rules laid down by Morgenthau and others back in Washington as closely as his conscience would allow, but he tried to moderate the effect, and this brought him into increasing conflict with Eisenhower and the other politically ambitious generals. In another letter to his wife he commented: "I have been at Frankfurt for a civil government conference. If what we are doing (to the Germans) is 'Liberty, then give me death.' I can't see how Americans can sink so low. It is Semitic, and I am sure of it."

[...]

His duties as military governor took Patton to all parts of Germany and intimately acquainted him with the German people and their condition. He could not help but compare them with the French, the Italians, the Belgians, and even the British. This comparison gradually forced him to the conclusion that World War II had been fought against the wrong people.

After a visit to ruined Berlin, he wrote his wife on July 21, 1945: "Berlin gave me the blues. We have destroyed what could have been a good race, and we are about to replace them with Mongolian savages. And all Europe will be communist. It's said that for the first week after they took it (Berlin), all women who ran were shot and those who did not were raped. I could have taken it (instead of the Soviets) had I been allowed."

This conviction, that the politicians had used him and the U.S. Army for a criminal purpose, grew in the following weeks. During a dinner with French General Alphonse Juin in August, Patton was surprised to find the Frenchman in agreement with him. His diary entry for August 18 quotes Gen. Juin: "It is indeed unfortunate, mon General, that the English and the Americans have destroyed in Europe the only sound country -- and I do not mean France. Therefore, the road is now open for the advent of Russian communism."

Later diary entries and letters to his wife reiterate this same conclusion. On August 31 he wrote: "Actually, the Germans are the only decent people left in Europe. it's a choice between them and the Russians. I prefer the Germans." And on September 2: "What we are doing is to destroy the only semi-modern state in Europe, so that Russia can swallow the whole."

By this time the Morgenthauists and media monopolists had decided that Patton was incorrigible and must be discredited.


http://thy-weapon-of-war.blogspot.com/2008/11/on-assassination-of-general-george.html

source: http://www.rense.com/general63/patton.htm

'Los Crimenes De Los Buenos' by Joaquin Bochaca Published January 1, 2001

An excerpt...

General Patton, perhaps the most popular of the American generals, immediately opposed the total or partial application of the Morgenthau Plan in his sector of occupation. Soon, he had a run-in with another general of higher rank: General Eisenhower. It's well-known what extremely violent debates they had about how the civilian population of Germany was to be treated. Patton was SENTENCED TO DEATH by the directors of the scenario.

One day Patton's car was run into by a military truck in what seemed like a very strange accident. The General was taken by ambulance to a hospital, where he was observed to have serious, but not life-threatening injuries. But some days later he died of a heart attack.

Patton's death, in any event, was extremely opportune. The General had annnounced that he was thinking of moving to the United States, where he was going to denounce publicly what was taking place in Germany. But he didn't have time. He had fought with too many important people. General Eisenhower had had to pick up the telephone and order that he be halted before he reached Berlin. At Yalta the new "masters of the world" had agreed that the Soviets would be the first to enter the German capital. Patton wanted to prevent the Vandal-like entrance of the Red Army into the capital of the Reich, and made an enemy of Eisenhower. A month before, he could have entered Prague, but was also detained by Eisenhower, leaving him nailed to the ground by an order.

Patton's difficulties with the WAR POWERS over the occupation of Germany were so great that Eisenhower stripped him of his position as Commander of the Third Army, and stuck him with the command of a secondary unit. Patton knew he was in danger of death, and confided as much to his family and close friends. He was feared because of his prestige-he was the most renowned American General, while Eisenhower was nothing more than a political soldier-and his words could alert the public to the reality of what was happening in Germany.

Thus the accident was set up, which was not by any means the first. On the 21st of April 1945, his airplane on which he was being transported to General Headquarters of the Third Army in Feldfield (England) was attacked by what was assumed to be a German fighter-bomber, but it turned out to be a "Spitfire" piloted by an inexpert Polish pilot. Patton's plane was shot up, but was miraculously able to land. On the 3rd of May, some days before the end of the war, the General's jeep was charged by an ox-drawn cart, leaving Patton with light injuries.

October 13, 1945 was when the collision with the truck occurred. When Patton appeared to be getting better from the accident, the "heart attack" occurred. The fact is that after October 13 only the doctors saw Patton, forbidding any other visitors.

Until recently, it was only speculation that Patton had been assassinated. Now it is known for a fact. And it is know for a very simple reason. Because an agent of the well-known OSS (Office of Strategic Services) or American military spy, a certain Douglas Bazata, a Jew of Lebanese origin, announced it in front of 450 invited guests; high ranking, ex-members of the OSS, in the Hilton Hotel in Washington, the 25th of September, 1979. Bazata said, word-for-word:

"For divers political reasons, many extremely high-ranking persons hated Patton. I know who killed him. Because I am the one who was hired to do it. Ten thousand dollars. General William Donovan himself, director of the O.S.S, entrusted me with the mission. I set up the accident. Since he didn't die in the accident, he was kept in isolation in the hospital, where he was killed with an injection
."


The tragic fate of Patton convinced other colleagues and their honorable compatriots of the uselessness of fighting against the WAR POWERS. ''

---------------------------------------------------------------------

Related Articles:

The REAL "holocaust" of WWII - the post-war genocide of at least three million Germans

"Crimes and Mercies" by James Bacque: the genocide of 9 to 14 million ethnic Germans under Allied occupation from 1944-1950

Wednesday, November 5, 2008

Unspeakable Atrocities - New German film on the greatest mass rape in history - 2 million German women raped by the Judeo-Bolsheviks from 1945-49

http://thy-weapon-of-war.blogspot.com/2008/11/unspeakable-atrocities-new-german-film.html



"Kill! Kill! In the German race there is nothing but evil; not one among the living, not one among the yet unborn but is evil! Follow the precepts of Comrade Stalin. Stamp out the fascist beast once and for all in its lair! Use force and break the racial pride of these German women. Take them as your lawful booty. Kill! As you storm onward, kill, you gallant soldiers of the Red Army." —Jewish Soviet propagandist Ilya Ehrenburg, in a leaflet distributed to Soviet soldiers upon entering Germany in 1945


http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1080493/Stalins-army-rapists-The-brutal-war-crime-Russia-Germany-tried-ignore.html#

Stalin's army of rapists: The brutal war crime that Russia and Germany tried to ignore

By Andrew Roberts
24th October 2008

Relations between Russia and Germany have not been good since Vladimir Putin's nationalist sabre-rattling this summer, but they are about to get a whole lot worse.

A new film about to be released in Germany will force both countries to re-examine part of their recent history that each would much prefer to forget. Yet it is right that the ghastly truth should finally be acknowledged.

The movie, A Woman In Berlin, is based on the diary of the German journalist Marta Hillers and depicts the horror of the Red Army's capture of the capital of the Third Reich in April and May 1945.

Marta was one of two million German women who were raped by soldiers of the Red Army - in her case, as in so many others, several times over.

It was a feature of Russia's 'liberation' and occupation of eastern Germany at the end of World War II that is familiar enough to historians, but which neither country cares to acknowledge took place on anything like the scale it did
.

[...]

In his fine new book, World War Two: Behind Closed Doors, the historian Laurence Rees points out that although rape was officially a crime in the Red Army, in fact, Stalin explicitly condoned it as a method of rewarding the soldiers and terrorising German civilians.

Stalin said people should ' understand it if a soldier who has crossed thousands of kilometres through blood and fire and death has fun with a woman or takes some trifle'.

On another occasion, when told that Red Army soldiers sexually maltreated German refugees, he said: 'We lecture our soldiers too much; let them have their initiative.'

While Stalin condoned rape as an instrument of state military policy, his police chief Lavrenti Beria was a serial rapist.

An American diplomat, Beria's bodyguard and the Russian actress Tatiana Okunevskaya all bore witness of his methods of grabbing women off the street and shoving them into his limousine and then his bed.

'You are a long way from anywhere, so whether you scream or not does not matter,' Beria would tell the women when he got them back to his dacha. 'You are in my power now. So think about that and behave accordingly.'

More than 100 school-aged girls and young women were drugged and raped by the man who ran the NKVD, the feared forerunner to the KGB.

[...]

The Red Army's atrocities against women in Dresden in the spring of 1945, a city that had already suffered heavily from Allied bombing, were carried out in a sickeningly systematic manner.

'In the house next to ours, Soviet troops went in and pulled the women on to the street, had their mattresses pulled out and raped the women,' recalled one inhabitant, John Noble.

'The men had to watch, and then the men were shot. Right at the end of the street, a woman was tied to a wagon wheel and terribly misused.

'Of course, you had the feeling that you wanted to stop it, but there was no possibility to do that.' Women going to and from work past Red Army pickets were routinely raped.

The historian Chris Bellamy believes that although there are no surviving written records to prove it, 'the hideous spectre of multiple rape was not only condoned, but, we can be pretty sure, legally sanctioned by the political officers speaking for the Soviet government'.


Additional Sources:

http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2002/jun/23/germany.kateconnolly

German rape victims find a voice at last

After 50 years a UK author has enabled countless women to admit their ordeal at the hands of Soviet troops.

Kate Connolly reports from Berlin
June 23, 2002

A bestselling book has prompted victims of one of the twentieth century's most tragic dramas to break their silence.

German women have come forward after 50 years to speak of their appalling treatment at the hands of Soviet soldiers, who raped their way across Germany for four years from 1945. Their ordeal has been revealed thanks to Antony Beevor, whose book Berlin: The Downfall 1945 came out in the UK to great acclaim last month.

In his book, Beevor, a Sandhurst recruit turned writer, uses previously unpublished material from Russian archives in Moscow to describe vividly the horrific suffering of an estimated two million German women and girls who were gang-raped by drunken Soviet soldiers as they made their way across the country with the aim of forcing the Nazis to retreat.

Among the victims were women who became prominent figures, including Hannelore Kohl, wife of the former Chancellor, Helmut. Mrs Kohl, who committed suicide last year, was raped along with her mother at the age of 12 as they failed to escape on a train bound for Dresden.

Beevor's book has unleashed an emotional response from scores of victims, mainly living in Britain, and their relatives, who have contacted him to express their gratitude that the story of an entire generation is finally being told.

'I was carrying out orders to bury some dead Hitler Youth boys when they found me,' Martha Dowsey says gently and slowly with a heavy German accent. 'Six Red Army soldiers with blackened faces held me down on the ground close to the graves and raped me one by one.' She repeats over and over: 'I'm not lying, I'm not, you must believe me.'

[...]

Beevor details the horrific consequences of events that resonated for years, affecting women's attitude towards sex and causing huge social problems between men and women.

By the late 1940s - the rapes went on for three years or more - the Soviet troops had left behind them a broken people. According to some reports, 90 per cent of Berlin women were infected with venereal diseases, while Beevor cites one doctor who said that, of the 100,000 women estimated to have been raped in Berlin, a tenth of them died, mostly from suicide. The mortality figures for the approximately 1.4 million raped in East Prussia, Pomerania and Silesia, he says, are believed to have been much higher.


[...]

Beevor has shed considerable light on a chapter in German history, the extent of which has remained largely unknown outside Germany and which in the country continues to be a taboo subject.


http://www.library.flawlesslogic.com/massrape.htm

App's "Ravishing the Women of Conquered Europe"

On March 24, 1945, our "noble Soviet allies" entered Danzig. A 50-year-old Danzig teacher reported that her niece, 15, was raped seven times, and her other niece, 22, was raped fifteen times. A Soviet officer told a group of women to seek safety in the Cathedral. Once they were securely locked inside, the beasts of Bolshevism entered, and ringing the bells and playing the organ, "celebrated" a foul orgy through the night, raping all the women, some more than thirty times. A Catholic pastor in Danzig declared, "They violated even eight-year-old girls and shot boys who tried to shield their mothers."

The Most Reverend Bernard Griffin, British Archbishop, made a tour of Europe to study conditions there, and reported, "In Vienna alone they raped 100,000 women, not once but many times, including girls not yet in their teens, and aged women."

A Lutheran pastor in Germany, in a letter of August 7, 1945, to the Bishop of Chichester, England, describes how a fellow pastor's "two daughters and a grandchild (ten years of age) suffer from gonorrhea, [as a] result of rape" and how "Mrs. N. was killed when she resisted an attempt to rape her," while her daughter was "raped and deported, allegedly to Omsk, Siberia, for indoctrination."

The day after our noble Soviet allies conquered Neisse, Silesia, 182 Catholic nuns were raped. In the diocese of Kattowitz 66 pregnant nuns were counted. In one convent when the Mother Superior and her assistant tried to protect the younger nuns with outstretched arms, they were shot down. A priest reported in Nord Amerika magazine for November 1, 1945, that he knew "several villages where all the women, even the aged and girls as young as twelve, were violated daily for weeks by the Russians."

[...]

Those Allies who were "no monsters" literally raped more European women than had ever before been raped in the history of the world. They put Germany on a starvation-level diet. Under direct orders from Dwight Eisenhower, they killed more than a million German POWs. They looted 12 million people of their homes, goods, food, and even clothes and drove them from their homelands. They took one-fourth of their farmland, they took their ships and their factories and their farm implements and then told them to live by farming. They abused and starved to death more German babies than there ever were Jews in Germany. They raped and debauched hundreds of thousands of German, Austrian, and Hungarian girls and women from eight to eighty. They brought to their death five times as many Germans in one year of peace as died during five years of war. Yes, yes, of course, these men of the United Nations, these men of the New World Order are no monsters.

Monday, November 3, 2008

Robert Edmondson "Testified Against the Jews"

By Henry Makow Ph.D.

Our Zionist mind controllers have succeeded in eliminating almost all record of Robert Edmondson. Until today, there was no reference to him (or photo) on the Internet. Yet he was thrown into jail in 1936 and again in 1942 for producing hundreds of bulletins alerting his fellow Americans to an International conspiracy financed by the central bankers and consisting largely of Communist Jews. This conspiracy has grown into the New World Order.

A measure of Zionist subversion is when a nation's defenders are defamed and forgotten, while its traitors are rewarded and honored. Other 1930's patriots tarred as "anti-Semites" include Charles Lindbergh. Henry Ford, Charles Coughlin, Elizabeth Dillling, William Pelley, Louis McFadden and Huey Long.

Their fate proves that despite what Americans think, the US is a colony of the London-based Masonic Jewish central banking cartel and its leaders are traitors. Americans haven't been "free" for a very long time.

In 1936, Edmondson was charged with "libeling the Jewish people." In his defense, he wrote, "I am not against Jews because of their religion, as a race, a people or as individuals, but because Jewish leadership [i.e. the bankers] is actively anti-American, is attempting to jettison the American political philosophy and take over the Country, and that I would continue to be anti-Jewish until Jewry repudiated such subversion. Were the offender any other than the Jewish minority, my attitude would be precisely the same. This problem is the biggest and most acute thing in the world today....

"Knowing that...pitiless publicity is the only cure for public evils, in 1934 I started on a campaign to expose Jewish Anti-Americanism and Talmudic Communism which has been called the "Code of Hell": a "Rabbi Racket" that victimizes its own followers; an international "Satanic System" subverting France, Britain, Germany and Russia, causing the present depression and moving to take over the United States through the Jewish Radical administration [of FDR.] "

Faced with exposure, organized Jewry backed down. Edmondson subpoenaed "Princes of Jewry" Bernard Buruch, Henry Morganthau, Rabbi Wise, Samurl Untermeyer, Mayor LaGuardia, James P. Warburg, Walter Lippmann and Justice Samuel Rosenman. Whereupon the American Jewish Committee petitioned the court NOT to hear the case because the indictment violated the free speech guarantee of the Constitution.

"Jews are afraid of the truth," Edmondson wrote. "They know that a few grains of it will blow the lid off when publicized." (137)

Today more than ever, we are victims of brainwashing which equates defending our country, freedom, family and values with Nazi bigotry and genocide. We are under merciless hate-filled attack from the bankers and their minions, yet it is we who are accused of "hatred" when we identify them. It's a pathetic disingenuous ruse. Remember the little boy who said the Emperor has no clothes? The Zionists put him in jail.

JEWISH LEADERSHIP AGGRESSION

The majority of Jews are not aware of the Jewish leadership's secret agenda, which meshes with that of the central banking cartel. Yet the security of ordinary Jews is jeopardized by this centuries-old plan for world government now reaching fruition. Unless they oppose it, they will be blamed for it. If they defend it, they are part of it.

By their silence, Jews condone the anti-Americanism of their leaders, Edmondson said. (82)

In 1954, Edmondson published a collection of his bulletins entitled "I Testify Against the Jews." (All previous and following page references are from this text.)

He quotes rare documents such as a letter published in 1880 in the Review of Jewish Studies, financed by James de Rothschild. The letter, dating from 1489, is from the head of the Grand Sanhedrin in Constantinople to a rabbi in Arles France who asked how to counter anti-Semitism. He was advised to infiltrate gentile society.

The advice of the Grand Satraps and Rabbis was to convert to Christianity as the French King demands but "keep the Law of Moses in your hearts;" make your sons merchants so "that they may despoil Christians of their [property]; doctors so that "they may take away Christian lives."

"Make your sons canons and clerics that they may destroy the churches.....Arrange that your sons become advocates and lawyers, and see that they always mix themselves up with affairs of state in order that by putting Christians under your yoke, you may dominate the world and be avenged on them." (71)

Edmondson also quotes a May 11 1933 address at the Hebrew University by the famous Jewish poet N.H. Bialik which confirms a Jewish agenda few Jews are aware of. He says Jews have undermined Christianity by "deliberate Jewish conniving...it has been effected in great measure by crypto Jews (Secret Jews) who have permeated Christianity and spoken through the mouth of Christianity." (51)

He says these crypto Jews are also the creators of "the Renaissance, of Liberalism, of Democracy, of Socialism, and of Communism." (151)

Remember he was speaking in 1933: "The Gentiles have at last realized this secret--that Judaism has gradually penetrated and permeated them like a drug. The Gentile nature is in revolt, and is trying to organize the final battle...They would 'smoke us out' of all the cracks and crannies where we have hidden. They would exterminate us like baccilli and be rid of us." (152)

This is proof that millions of innocent Jews, including my grandparents, died partly because of the demented megalomania of the Jewish leadership. Ironically the Nazis were financed by the Jewish bankers as a way of forcing Jews to support Zionism.

CONCLUSION

Judaism is a conspiracy against Christian Western civilization which has succeeded to such an extent that it cannot even be mentioned. It has inspired the bankers to recast society so there will be no families, no marriages, no private property and no freedom.

It has divorced society from God, who is synonymous with absolute truth and justice. It has inundated us with pornography and trivia and debased culture. It has poisoned the well of gender and degraded relations between men and women.

We live in a decadent, superficial, hypocritical society where people sell their souls for money and sex, and where mass media and education are devoted to propaganda and indoctrination. Denied the truth, we are kept in a state of arrested development, befitting children or "cattle." The peoples of the world and even their governments are "only children under age." (Protocols of Zion, 15)

We can be as politically correct as long as we want, but we can't escape the fact that mankind is in the thrall of a Satanic force bent on enslaving us.

---Related-Mark Glenn "The Joy of Being Gentile"

Saturday, November 1, 2008

Suppressed History: White Slavery in Early America and Industrial Britain



http://thy-weapon-of-war.blogspot.com/2008/11/suppressed-history-white-slavery-in.html

source: http://www.revisionisthistory.org/forgottenslaves.html

The Forgotten Slaves: Whites in Servitude in Early America and Industrial Britain

by Michael A. Hoffman II

[...]

When White servitude is acknowledged as having existed in America, it is almost always termed as temporary "indentured servitude" or part of the convict trade, which, after the Revolution of 1776, centered on Australia instead of America. The "convicts" transported to America under the 1723 Waltham Act, perhaps numbered 100,000.

The indentured servants who served a tidy little period of 4 to 7 years polishing the master's silver and china and then taking their place in colonial high society, were a minuscule fraction of the great unsung hundreds of thousands of White slaves who were worked to death in this country from the early l7th century onward.

Up to one-half of all the arrivals in the American colonies were Whites slaves and they were America's first slaves. These Whites were slaves for life, long before Blacks ever were.
This slavery was even hereditary. White children born to White slaves were enslaved too.

[...]

The Establishment has created the misnomer of "indentured servitude" to explain away and minimize the fact of White slavery. But bound Whites in early America called themselves slaves. Nine-tenths of the White slavery in America was conducted without indentures of any kind but according to the so-called "custom of the country," as it was known, which was lifetime slavery administered by the White slave merchants themselves.

[...]

I challenge any researcher to study 17th century colonial America, sifting the documents, the jargon and the statutes on both sides of the Atlantic and one will discover that White slavery was a far more extensive operation than Black enslavement. It is when we come to the 18th century that one begins to encounter more "servitude" on the basis of a contract of indenture. But even in that period there was kidnapping of Anglo-Saxons into slavery as well as convict slavery.

[...]

Those academics who insist that slavery is an exclusively Black racial condition forget or deliberately omit the fact that the word slave originally was a reference to Whites of East European origin - "Slavs."

[...]

Because of the rank prostitution, stupidity and cowardice of America's teachers and educational system, White youth are taught that Black slaves, Mexican peons and Chinese coolies built this country while the vast majority of the Whites lorded it over them with a lash in one hand and a mint julep in the other.

The documentary record tells a very different story, however. When White Congressman David Wilmot authored the Wilmot Proviso to keep Black slaves out of the American West he did so, he said, to preserve that vast expanse of territory for "the sons of toil, my own race and color."

This is precisely what most White people in America were, "sons of toil," performing backbreaking labor such as few of us today can envision. They had no paternalistic welfare system; no Freedman's Bureau to coo sweet platitudes to them; no army of bleeding hearts to worry over their hardships. These Whites were the expendable frontline soldiers in the expansion of the American frontier. They won the country, felled the trees, cleared and planted the land.

[...]

The chronicle of White slavery in America comprises the dustiest shelf in the darkest corner of suppressed American history. Should the truth about that epoch ever emerge into the public consciousness of Americans, the whole basis for the swindle of "Affirmative action," "minority set-asides" and proposed "Reparations to African-Americans" will be swept away. The fact is, the White working people of this country owe no one. They are themselves the descendants, as Congressman Wilmot so aptly said, of "the sons of toil."

There will only be racial peace when knowledge of radical historical truths are widespread and both sides negotiate from positions of strength and not from fantasies of White working class guilt and the uniqueness of Black suffering.




Ernst Zundel Interviews Michael Hoffman on his book, "They Were White and They Were Slaves" (part 1 of 3)


part 2 of 3

part 3 of 3

Wednesday, October 29, 2008

The Absolute Necessity of Righteous Hatred in Response to Evil

http://thy-weapon-of-war.blogspot.com/2008/11/absolute-necessity-of-righteous-hatred.html


ABOVE: Lot and his family flee Sodom

Ecclesiastes 3:1-4,7-8: "To every thing there is a season, and a time to every purpose under the heaven: A time to be born, and a time to die; a time to plant, and a time to pluck up that which is planted; A time to kill, and a time to heal; a time to break down, and a time to build up; A time to weep, and a time to laugh; a time to mourn, and a time to dance;...A time to rend, and a time to sew; a time to keep silence, and a time to speak; A time to love, and a time to hate; a time of war, and a time of peace."


The point I'm making here is obvious to most everyone -- at least on a subconscious level. But because of the ruse by the Jewish Establishment to demonize and censor certain "politically incorrect" viewpoints under the label and buzzword of "hate speech", we are now forced to address this issue.

The definition of "hatred" is "intense dislike or extreme aversion or hostility" towards something. This is the opposite, of course, of "love" or "strong liking" for something. Love and hatred are different sides of the same coin. They are inseverable. One cannot exist without the other. For instance, a love of truth means one must hate lies. Likewise, a love of justice requires the hatred of corruption. On the converse, if you tolerate or accept corruption and lies, then you actually hate the truth and justice.

Everyone, thus, has strong feelings and beliefs of both love and hatred. The central issue is what it is that a person hates. This is manifested most importantly in how a person responds to good vs. evil, truth vs. lies, and corruption vs. justice. You must love one and hate the other.

Matthew 6:24: "No man can serve two masters: for either he will hate the one, and love the other; or else he will hold to the one, and despise the other. Ye cannot serve God and mammon."


Righteous hatred for evil is clearly demonstrated by Yahweh ('God'), the Creator. But not only does it apply to abstract concepts, or actions. It also applies to individuals, persons, and races of people. As recorded in both the Old and New Testaments, 'God' does not love all humanity -- because some people are righteous while others are wicked. And, by the way, not all "humanity" is even descended from Adam, as I discussed in a previous article. To the contrary, 'God' loves some and hates others. For example, He loved Jacob/Israel, and hated his brother Esau (Malachi 1:2-3).

And some "humans" are actually the biological offspring of Satan and the fallen angels, including the Canaanites and Jews, as discussed in this earlier article. For instance, when the Israelites entered the land of Canaan (modern-day 'Palestine'), 'God' commanded the Israelites to completely destroy the Canaanite tribes (which were of such "serpentine" or devilish ancestry) that were then living in the land.

Turning our attention now to what the Jewish Establishment -- through the media, Hollywood, etc -- demonizes as "hate." The religion/ideology of the Jews, Talmudic Judaism, is based in Babylonian occultism (eg, the most important book in Judaism is officially titled the "Babylonian Talmud") and is therefore effectively Satanism -- which is why Jewish "political correctness" flips morality upside down. According to Jewish political correctness, what is righteous, healthy, and just is demonized as "kooky", "backward", "hateful", and "wrong." Meanwhile, what is corrupt, filthy, and evil is promoted as "acceptable" or "good."

Jewish political correctness is not an absence of hatred. Rather, it requires hatred of that which is good, in order to promote that which is evil. So, for example, it is "kosher" and "politically correct" to hate fundamentalist Christianity, to hate social conservatives and 'white nationalists' (who are simply trying to preserve their own racial and cultural heritage), and to hate those whom speak the truth on a whole range of issues, such as the Holocaust™ Hoax and 9/11 (eg, demonized as "kooks", "conspiracy theorists", "haters", and "anti-Semites").

The Jewish Establishment teaches "tolerance" towards virtually everything that is antithetical to a healthy white Christian society -- eg, homosexuality, mass Third World Immigration, abortion, race-mixing, etc. To tolerate evil is to condone and accept it, and technically to "love" it. The Righteousness of 'God' requires that we are to abhor evil (in all its forms, actions, and personages) with pure, unashamed, righteous hostility -- and to the point that we take action to remove that corruption and wickedness from our presence.

Saturday, October 25, 2008

An introduction to the 'Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion' - Blueprint for Jewish World Conquest

http://thy-weapon-of-war.blogspot.com/2008/11/introduction-to-protocols-of-learned.html



The "Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion" is truly one of the most remarkable and controversial documents in the history of the world. It is purportedly the text of an address to an inner circle of Jewish conspirators in the late 19th century (at the First Zionist Congress held at Basle, Switzerland in 1897) detailing their plans, developed through the ages and updated to that point in time, for achieving World Jewish Conquest -- otherwise known as the conspiracy for a "new world order."

The Jews, of course, vehemently deny the authenticity of the document, claiming that it is a "fraud" or "forgery." These claims are false, as can be conclusively proven by the simple fact that virtually all the plans and "prophecies" in the Protocols have been since implemented or fulfilled -- and almost exclusively by known Jewish individuals, groups, and agents.

At the time of the recording of this particular edition of the Protocols, the Jews had partially achieved many of their objectives. For instance, they had obtained almost complete monopoly control of international banking in the Western World at that time, with the United States soon to fall to international Jewry with the establishment of the Rothschild's "Federal Reserve" Bank in 1913. Also, they were well on their way to complete control of the press and newspaper industry in the West.

Among other things, the Protocols called for Jewish domination and control of the press and media (note the current Jewish control of the press, television media, and Hollywood), use of communism to destroy the aristocracy of nations (eg, the Bolshevik take-over and assassination of the Romanov family in 1917-18), a concerted attack on Christianity and belief in God in society, the rise of world government and globalism, the destruction of the middle class, the erosion and destruction of individual liberties, the subversion of Christian society through corruption of the morals of the youth, and the use of "universal war" against any nation that may oppose them (eg, WWII against Germany).

The Protocols exhibit the mind of a diabolical genius, demonstrating inhuman cruelty and hatred towards Christians and non-Jews, and with stunning insights into the human condition, the art of cunning and deception in regards to all things political, and subversion and control of populations. I would be surprised if the bulk of the text was not obtained via communication with demonic entities -- like the writings of many prominent occultists, including Madame Blavatsky and Aleister Crowley.

Perhaps no other document provides such a clear understanding of why and how the world is moving in its current direction towards tyranny and globalism, and who is responsible. It is a virtual blueprint for the "new world order" conspiracy, with Organized Jewry no doubt consulting the Protocols (and subsequent revisions to the plan) like a "playbook." Every serious truthseeker absolutely must read this document for themselves.

Text of The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion
http://www.biblebelievers.org.au/przion1.htm


A summary of the The Protocols of Zion

Jews are superior to the rest of humanity (called "goyim"), who are but mere "beasts" or "cattle" compared to the Jews. The goyim should be exterminated for the most part, with only enough left remaining to be Jews' slaves and servants, and these goyim ruled by despotic Jewish World Government, with all the wealth of the world being transferred to the Jews. In order to achieve this objective, the following plans are to be implemented:

-Control gold and banking in order to control governments through the money power (Protocol 1)
-Control the governments of the goyim from behind the scenes
-Rule by force, violence, fear, bribery, blackmail, treachery, and deceit
-Destroy the minds of the goyim through subversion of the "education" system
-Reduce the goyim to poverty and serfdom, and keep them in perpetual labor to distract their minds from resisting the Jews
-Use communism to destroy the aristocracy of the goyim nations (Protocol 3)
-Destroy belief in God among the goyim, and replace it with materialism (Protocol 4)
-Lead the masses by lies via the jews' controlled press
-Use speculation, as opposed to sound investing, to transfer the wealth of the world into the Jews' hands (Protocol 6)
-Destroy the youth of the goyim through false doctrines (Protocol 9)
-Take away the liberties of the goyim under the pretense of protecting their safety (Protocol 11)
-Destroy the freedom of the press and bring all organs of the press under the control of the Jews (Protocol 12)
-Use Secret Societies and Freemasonic Lodges as recruiting grounds for goyim agents (Protocol 15)
-Engineer economic depressions to bring down the goyim nations (Protocol 20)
-Use the tyranny of usury, and especially lending to governments, to enslave the goyim (Protocol 20)
-Through use of agents in all places of influence, throw the nations of the goyim into turmoil until they willingly accept Jewish World Government (Protocol 9)



Views on the Protocols

"Upon that much-vexed subject the authenticity of ... The Protocols of Zion we shall not enter, except to say that if the document is a forgery, as alleged, then it is one of the most remarkable in the history of literature."—The Spectator, London, October 16th, 1920

"Those who feel libeled by the Protocols have the most obvious remedy in the world; all they have to do is to ruse and denounce the policy of them, instead of denying the authorship ... But when you come to read them how can any reasonable man deny the truth of what is contained in them??"—Norman Jaques, M.P., in Canadian House of Commons, July 9th, 1943

"On the one hand, the authenticity of this document cannot be proved; on the other hand, the efforts made by some writers, principally Jewish, to show it to be a forgery do not carry conviction to many serious minds."—The Rev. Denny Fahey, C.S.Sp., B.A., D.D., 1939

"Whosoever was the mind that conceived them possessed a knowledge of human nature, of history, and of statecraft which is dazzling in its brilliant completeness, and terrible in the objects to which it turns its power. It is too terribly real for fiction, too well sustained for speculation, to deep in its knowledge of the secret springs of life for forgery."—The Dearborn Independent, July 10th, 1920

Wednesday, October 22, 2008

Yahshua (aka 'Jesus') was not a 'jew'

http://thy-weapon-of-war.blogspot.com/2008/11/yahshua-aka-jesus-was-not-jew.html

First of all, the term "jew" is NOT interchangeable with the term "Israelite." Modern mistranslations of the Bible have incorrectly used the term "jew" when "Israelite" or "Judahite" (ie, an inhabitant of the geographical land of Judea, or a descendant of the tribe of Judah) should have been used. The term "jew" did not even come into existence until the 17th or 18th century A.D.

As discussed in a previous article, modern-day so-called "jews" are not the physical descendants of the ancient Israelites -- but rather descended from the Khazars, Edomites, and Canaanites. In fact, it was the ancestors of the "jews" -- the kindred of the Pharisees and Sauducees (whom were mongrelized Edomites and Canaanites) -- who primarily opposed Yahshua (aka 'Jesus') and ultimately had him killed.

Yahshua was not of the same racial stock as the people of the Pharisees, Sauducees, and their kindred who dominated the land of Judea at that time. He was a pure-blooded Israelite of the tribe of Judah, as were all of his disciples with the exception of Judas, the one who betrayed him.


Jesus was NOT a Jew!!! Christian Identity Truth
- by Bertrand Comparet



http://www.biblebelievers.org.au/jesusjew.htm

Many denominational Christians and even church leaders are under the mistaken belief that Jesus was a Jew. But nothing could be further from the truth.

Judea and Galilee were two separate states and political entities, as illustrated on the map of Palestine in the time of our Saviour in your Bible. Jesus Himself was not a Jew (Judean) or resident of Judea, He was a Galilean or resident of Galilee (Matthew 26:69; John 7:41), and a Judahite or descendent of the Tribe of Judah. The Judeans of prominence were not of the Tribe of Judah, but of Edomites. Pilate was being ironic when he wrote the sign "Jesus of Nazareth, King of the Judeans" for the Cross (John 19:19). That is, "the Galilean who was King of the Judeans," as in "Queen Victoria of England, Empress of India." Jesus grew up in Nazareth in Galilee. His disciples were fishermen from the Sea of Galilee. And although He visited Jerusalem, he spent most of His life in his home country of Galilee. John 7:1, "After this Jesus stayed in Galilee; for He could not walk in Judea, because the Jews sought to kill him." His followers were constrained "for fear of the Jews" (John 7:13, 19:38, 20:19).

[...]

Christ demonstrated a very real antipathy towards the people called Jews, in Bibles published after about 1776, but who would be more accurately described as Judeans, or residents of the Edomite-dominated territory of Judea. Jesus said to the Jews "You do not believe because you are not of My sheep" (John 10:24-27). "I was only sent to the lost sheep of the House of Israel" (Matthew 15:24). In fact, Christ referred to "those Jews (or residents of Judea regardless of religion, race or color) who believed on him," as "of their father the devil" for although they were children of Abraham, they were not children of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob, and heirs of the blessing of Abraham, nor did they have the faith of Abraham, and were in all probability descendants of Abraham, Isaac and Esau (John 8: 31,44). In contrast, Jesus instructed His disciples - who were from Galilee of the Gentiles, not Judea (Acts 1:11; 2:7) - to pray to And in Revelation 2:9 and 3:9, Jesus speaks of "those who say they are Jews and are not, but are the synagogue of Satan".

The Jews shouted "Crucify Him!" (John 19:15); "His blood be on us and on our children" (Matthew 27:25). In an appropriate turn about, when Jesus returns, their blood will stain His own garments. The spiritual leaders of the Jews were the Pharisees, who not surprisingly were associated with the (Edomite) Herodians (Matthew 22:15-16; Mark 3:6; 12:13). Jesus repeatedly condemned the Pharisees as "hypocrites" (Matthew 15:7; 22:18; 23:13,15,23,25,27-27). He also called them "serpents, the offspring of vipers" (Matthew 3:7; 12:34; 23:33).

"Jesus spoke to the crowds only in parables" (Matthew 13:10-17). Why was this? Many nominal churches and Sunday schools teach that Jesus used parables to make His teachings clearer. But all four Gospels say the opposite. When Jesus was asked why He spoke to them in parables, He replied "Because it is given to you to know the mysteries of the kingdom of heaven, but to them it is not given" (Matthew 13:10-11; Mark 4:11-12; Luke 8:9-10; John 12:37-44).